全球主机交流论坛

标题: 新买的burst 大家来测试一下.越多越好 [打印本页]
作者: polar    时间: 2010-3-4 16:39
标题: 新买的burst 大家来测试一下.越多越好
64.120.209.38


大家来测试一下 截图上来
作者: 11qq    时间: 2010-3-4 16:44
Request timed out.
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=49
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=49
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=484ms TTL=49

线路：广东电信E家宽

时间：16：45-46分两次

Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=49
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

[ 本帖最后由 11qq 于 2010-3-4 16:46 编辑 ]
作者: polar    时间: 2010-3-4 16:56
丢包有点严重哦
作者: wzwen    时间: 2010-3-4 17:11
安徽电信，还不错。



Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 64.120.209.38

Pinging 64.120.209.38 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 64.120.209.38:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 257ms, Maximum = 257ms, Average = 257ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>
作者: iamfly    时间: 2010-3-4 18:10
你这个丢包很严重啊
作者: lylover    时间: 2010-3-4 18:21
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: cpt137    时间: 2010-3-4 20:25
今天burst丢包严重，不过速度还算可以，起码比L3的要强的多
作者: cnx    时间: 2010-3-4 20:48
原帖由 cpt137 于 2010-3-4 20:25 发表
今天burst丢包严重，不过速度还算可以，起码比L3的要强的多


嗯，是国内的问题。
作者: Yikmings    时间: 2010-3-6 07:35
Pinging 64.120.209.38 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=48
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 64.120.209.38:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 275ms, Maximum = 276ms, Average = 275ms


Ping from hkbn bb100
作者: polar    时间: 2010-3-6 13:47
有没有人在来PING啊
作者: WAKAKA    时间: 2010-3-6 13:58
原帖由 polar 于 2010-3-6 13:47 发表
有没有人在来PING啊

这么多人来了，是不是要不要来dddddos啊
作者: Yikmings    时间: 2010-3-6 19:01
原帖由 WAKAKA 于 2010-3-6 13:58 发表

这么多人来了，是不是要不要来dddddos啊


對! 這個建議不錯，估計很快多人。
作者: iamfly    时间: 2010-3-6 21:57
Pinging 64.120.209.38 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=307ms TTL=46
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=309ms TTL=46
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=308ms TTL=46
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=309ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 64.120.209.38:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 307ms, Maximum = 309ms, Average = 308ms
作者: afterx    时间: 2010-3-15 16:42
Pinging 64.120.209.38 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=397ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=330ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=416ms TTL=47
Request timed out.
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=501ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=469ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=398ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=431ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=476ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=450ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=453ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=429ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=338ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=383ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=392ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=432ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=409ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=442ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=442ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=405ms TTL=47
成都电信
作者: daocaomen    时间: 2010-3-27 14:52
河南网通2M

Pinging 64.120.209.38 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=450ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=469ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=450ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=464ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 64.120.209.38:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 450ms, Maximum = 469ms, Average = 458ms
作者: 小新    时间: 2010-3-27 15:17
C:\Users\Xin>ping 64.120.209.38

正在 Ping 64.120.209.38 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 64.120.209.38 的回复: 字节=32 时间=361ms TTL=53
来自 64.120.209.38 的回复: 字节=32 时间=361ms TTL=53
来自 64.120.209.38 的回复: 字节=32 时间=359ms TTL=53
来自 64.120.209.38 的回复: 字节=32 时间=361ms TTL=53

64.120.209.38 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 359ms，最长 = 361ms，平均 = 360ms

广东电信
作者: surftheair    时间: 2010-4-13 16:32
Pinging 64.120.209.38 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=294ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=295ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=294ms TTL=43
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=297ms TTL=43
作者: snang    时间: 2010-4-13 20:03
丢包。。。
作者: mayi1208    时间: 2010-4-13 20:23
Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\mayi1208>ping 64.120.209.38 -t

Pinging 64.120.209.38 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=318ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=322ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=325ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=325ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=336ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=323ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=321ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=329ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=356ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=318ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=319ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=323ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=323ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=322ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=322ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=336ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=322ms TTL=42
Reply from 64.120.209.38: bytes=32 time=324ms TTL=42

深圳天威 2兆
作者: ccp    时间: 2010-4-13 20:30
我的173.212.221.150
  1. iMac:~ chen$ traceroute 173.212.221.150
  2. traceroute to 173.212.221.150 (173.212.221.150), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
  3. 1  192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)  0.916 ms  0.569 ms  0.544 ms
  4. 2  119.123.200.1 (119.123.200.1)  165.074 ms  38.646 ms  30.766 ms
  5. 3  121.15.150.109 (121.15.150.109)  21.460 ms  22.649 ms  21.961 ms
  6. 4  219.133.30.230 (219.133.30.230)  21.966 ms  252.188 ms  63.783 ms
  7. 5  119.145.47.50 (119.145.47.50)  25.057 ms  29.185 ms  108.320 ms
  8. 6  202.97.33.194 (202.97.33.194)  26.160 ms  175.667 ms  130.802 ms
  9. 7  202.97.60.70 (202.97.60.70)  24.517 ms  25.036 ms
  10.     202.97.60.182 (202.97.60.182)  25.186 ms
  11. 8  202.97.50.130 (202.97.50.130)  189.359 ms  191.057 ms  366.297 ms
  12. 9  202.97.50.70 (202.97.50.70)  202.910 ms  258.637 ms  202.430 ms
  13. 10  218.30.54.82 (218.30.54.82)  275.516 ms  189.483 ms  226.248 ms
  14. 11  te-4-2-0.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net (207.88.12.185)  214.569 ms  203.129 ms *
  15. 12  te-2-0-0.rar3.washington-dc.us.xo.net (207.88.12.70)  494.626 ms  319.850 ms  267.418 ms
  16. 13  ae0d0.mcr1.philadelphia-pa.us.xo.net (216.156.0.42)  452.540 ms  323.732 ms  267.152 ms
  17. 14  216.55.42.26 (216.55.42.26)  492.380 ms  330.867 ms  286.744 ms
  18. 15  ec1-13.agg02.sctn01.hostnoc.net (64.191.108.46)  278.640 ms  486.220 ms  330.557 ms
  19. 16  ec1-15.f2801.sctn01.hostnoc.net (96.9.156.66)  268.047 ms  267.000 ms  323.925 ms
  20. 17  vserver30.hostnoc.net (66.197.238.202)  320.458 ms  297.028 ms  420.466 ms
  21. 18  173-212-221-150.hostnoc.net (173.212.221.150)  358.626 ms  270.437 ms  302.558 ms
复制代码
楼主的
  1. iMac:~ chen$ traceroute 64.120.209.38
  2. traceroute to 64.120.209.38 (64.120.209.38), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
  3. 1  192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)  1.096 ms  0.698 ms  0.646 ms
  4. 2  119.123.200.1 (119.123.200.1)  24.472 ms  35.531 ms  30.717 ms
  5. 3  121.15.150.57 (121.15.150.57)  21.724 ms  228.669 ms  129.529 ms
  6. 4  58.60.24.57 (58.60.24.57)  21.431 ms  21.845 ms  20.356 ms
  7. 5  119.145.47.50 (119.145.47.50)  93.217 ms  23.919 ms  22.604 ms
  8. 6  202.97.33.202 (202.97.33.202)  27.337 ms  167.889 ms  31.419 ms
  9. 7  202.97.60.70 (202.97.60.70)  42.450 ms  23.976 ms  32.426 ms
  10. 8  202.97.50.102 (202.97.50.102)  209.596 ms  229.597 ms  230.530 ms
  11. 9  * 202.97.50.74 (202.97.50.74)  293.524 ms  225.067 ms
  12. 10  218.30.54.74 (218.30.54.74)  203.632 ms  203.203 ms  302.886 ms
  13. 11  * te-4-2-0.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net (207.88.12.185)  211.054 ms *
  14. 12  te-2-0-0.rar3.washington-dc.us.xo.net (207.88.12.70)  479.613 ms  391.031 ms  273.902 ms
  15. 13  ae0d0.mcr1.philadelphia-pa.us.xo.net (216.156.0.42)  363.262 ms  421.698 ms *
  16. 14  216.55.42.26 (216.55.42.26)  274.050 ms  396.004 ms  274.193 ms
  17. 15  ec1-20.agg04.sctn01.hostnoc.net (96.9.191.14)  286.309 ms *  296.989 ms
  18. 16  ec0-61.bf2803.sctn01.hostnoc.net (96.9.184.61)  284.422 ms  283.586 ms  416.020 ms
  19. 17  * vserver133.hostnoc.net (64.120.200.10)  285.976 ms  282.141 ms
  20. 18  www.ebmmarechalrondon.com (64.120.209.38)  305.593 ms  305.531 ms *
复制代码

[ 本帖最后由 ccp 于 2010-4-13 20:32 编辑 ]
作者: cnx    时间: 2010-4-13 20:55
标题: 回复 20# 的帖子
你的是vserver30，比较靠前哈。
作者: taian    时间: 2010-4-14 21:03
送一个IP。



欢迎光临 全球主机交流论坛 (https://hostloc.onozo.cc/) Powered by Discuz! X3.4